What should officers consider when determining the use of deadly force?

When determining the use of deadly force, it is crucial for officers to assess whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to human life. This principle is grounded in the necessity to protect not only the lives of officers but also the lives of civilians. The use of deadly force is justified when an officer reasonably believes that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious bodily harm or death to themselves or others.

The focus on an immediate threat ensures that deadly force is used only as a last resort, aligning with both legal and ethical standards governing law enforcement practices. Officers are trained to evaluate the situation dynamically, weighing the actions and behaviors of the suspect, and determining if there are any alternatives to de-escalation or non-lethal means before resorting to lethal options. Recognizing an immediate threat is fundamental in justifying the use of deadly force under the circumstances.

Other factors, such as a suspect's criminal history, advice from a superior officer, or the time of day, may provide context but do not directly justify the use of deadly force. The critical consideration remains whether there is an active and immediate risk to life, reinforcing the principle of proportionality in the use of force.